Saturday, August 26, 2017

New York Announces Major Changes to Medical Cannabis Program

New York Announces Major Changes to Medical Cannabis Program

Following up from its August 10th news release, the New York State Department of Health has published proposed regulations to the New York State Register today that detail some substantial changes ahead for the program (see pages 5-7). The proposed rules are subject to a 30-day public comment period before they can be be adopted.
The state will now permit new forms of products, like capsules, chewable tablets and lozenges.  Additionally, advertising restrictions were reduced, with registered organizations now permitted to use lighting with their signage for dispensaries, which no longer are limited to black and white. Even with the changes, the program, which currently serves 28,077 certified patients, has room for further improvement, according to Jeremy Unruh, General Counsel at PharmaCann.
New York recently added five new registered organizations, bring the total to ten, including Citiva Medical, Columbia Care, Etain, Fiorella Pharmaceuticals, MedMen, NYCANNA, PalliaTech NY, PharmaCann, Valley Agriceuticals and Vireo Health. Publicly-traded iAnthus Capital Holdings (CSE: IAN) (OTC: ITHUF) recently announced a pending acquisition of Citiva. MedMen acquired Bloomfield Industries earlier this year.
Here is the complete text of the proposed rules:
Substance of revised rule (Full text is posted at the following State
website: https://regs.health.ny.gov/regulations/proposed-rule-making):
Pursuant to the authority vested in the Commissioner of Health by Section
3369-a of the Public Health Law (PHL), Part 1004 of Title 10 (Health) of
the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of
New York, and pursuant to Section 502 of the PHL, Subpart 55-2 of Title
10, are amended, to be effective upon publication of a Notice of Adoption
in the New York State Register, to read as follows:
§ 1004.1 Practitioner registration. Section 1004.1(a) and (b) are
amended to align with the statute, which requires practitioners to complete
a two to four-hour course and register with the department before certifying
patients for medical marihuana.
§ 1004.2 Practitioner issuance of certification. Section 1004.2(a) is
amended to clarify the department’s expectation that practitioners adhere
to new section 1004.2(e) which details the statutory requirement to consult
the Prescription Monitoring Program Registry. Section 1004.2(a) is further
amended to require registered practitioners to indicate on patient
certifications whether a patient is temporarily residing in New York State
for the purpose of receiving care and treatment from the practitioner.
§ 1004.3 Application for registration as a certified patient. Section
1004.3(b) is amended to clarify that New York State residents must show
proof of residency. Section 1004.3(b) is amended to remove the requirement
that applicants include a statement in their application if they are
temporarily residing in New York State for purposes of receiving care and
treatment in in the state, as this requirement will now be documented by
the certifying practitioner.
§ 1004.4 Designated caregiver registration. Section 1004.4(b) is
amended to indicate that acceptable proof of residence for a caregiver
includes a New York State non-driver identification card.
§ 1004.5 Application for initial registration as a registered organization.
Section 1004.5(b) is amended to clarify the requirement to submit a prepared
financial statement upon initial application for designation as a
registered organization.
§ 1004.6 Consideration of registered organization applications. Section
1004.6(a) is amended to allow forms of payment other than a certified
check. Section 1004.6(e) is amended to clarify that a registered organization’s
registration may be amended instead of the application for
registration.
§ 1004.10 Registered organizations; general requirements. Section
1004.10(a) is amended to include a process in which the department will
provide a statement of findings to a registered organization, and that the
registered organization must respond and implement a plan of correction
to address any deficiencies identified by the department. Section
1004.10(a) is also amended to allow manufacturing materials to be submitted
to the department upon request and to reduce sample retention duration
from two years to thirty days after the date of expiration. Further, this
section is amended to clarify that registered organizations must notify the
department of adverse events and other incidents within 24 hours and
must inventory and maintain records of medical marihuana products or
by-products which are disposed. Section 1004.10(a) is also amended to
account for records that may need to be maintained for a time period other
than five years and to require registered organizations to post a registration
certificate in a conspicuous location on the premises of each manufacturing
and dispensing facility site. Section 1004.10(b) is amended to clarify
criminal history requirements for registered organization managers or
employees.
§ 1004.11 Manufacturing requirements for approved medical marihuana
product(s). Section 1004.11(a)(2) is amended to update the allowable
range of THC and CBD concentration per dose and brand for potency testing
purposes, and is amended to remove the term “extraction” from the
definition of a brand. Section 1004.11(c) is modified to remove the prohibition
on the use of unprocessed whole flower, to coincide with amendments
to section 1004.11(g) and the allowable forms of administration.
Section 1004.11(c) is also amended to clarify reporting requirements for
other cannabinoid components at >0.1%. Section 1004.11(e) is amended
to update the allowable range of THC and CBD concentration per dose
and brand for potency testing purposes and is updated to clarify that the
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation is the authority
which registers acceptable pesticides. In addition, section 1004.11(e) is
modified to add a requirement that registered organizations shall ensure
continual environmental monitoring of harvested plant material awaiting
additional processing. Section 1004.11(g) is modified to allow registered organizations to produce medical marihuana products in new forms of
administration. Section 1004.11(h) is amended to allow registered
organizations to break the seal of an approved medical marihuana product
for internal quality control testing or destruction. Section 1004.11(k) is
amended to clarify labeling requirements related to stability studies. Section
1004.11(m) is amended to clarify stability testing requirements and to
account for initial stability testing limitations. Section 1004.11(n) is
amended to make clear that registered organizations may not use any cannabinoid
preparation not produced by a registered organization in an approved
manufacturing facility.
§ 1004.12 Requirements for dispensing facilities. Section 1004.12(a) is
amended to clarify that medical marihuana products may not be dispensed
or handled unless an individual with an active New York State pharmacist
license is on the premises and supervising. Section 1004.12(a) is further
revised to clarify that dispensing facility pharmacists must complete a four
hour course approved by the commissioner pursuant to section 1004.1(b).
Section 1004.12(b) is amended to allow dispensing facilities to sell additional
items. Section 1004.12(d) is stricken to allow food or beverages to
be consumed on the premises of a dispensing facility. Section 1004.12(f)
is changed to section 1004.12(d) and new section 1004.12(d) is amended
to include a requirement that the Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP)
Registry be consulted prior to dispensing approved medical marihuana
products. Section 1004.12(g) is changed to section 1004.12(e) and new
section 1004.12(e) is amended to clarify dispensing facility access
restrictions. Section 1004.12(h) is changed to section 1004.12(f) and new
section 1004.12(f) is revised to clarify that labels shall include the expiration
date of the product once opened. Section 1004.12(m) is changed to
section 1004.12(k) and new section 1004.12(k) is modified to clarify the
documentation requirements for dispensing facilities that accept returns of
approved medical marihuana products and to ensure secure storage until
returned products can be properly disposed.
§ 1004.13 Security requirements for manufacturing and dispensing
facilities. Section 1004.13(a) is revised to clarify that production and
harvesting are included in the definition of manufacturing and a video
surveillance requirement is also added to the disposal process. Section
1004.13(a)(8) is amended to allow registered organizations to use an
automatic voice dialer, digital dialer or other acceptable industry standard
equivalent. Section 1004.13(c) removes the requirement that a back-up
alarm system needs to be provided by a different company than the primary
alarm. Section 1004.13(g) reduces the frequency of alarm system
testing that must be conducted by the registered organization. Section
1004.13(h) addresses visitors at the manufacturing facility. Section
1004.13(i) is amended to clarify the requirements for storage of marihuana.
Section 1004.13(j) is amended to clarify that registered organizations must
store medical marihuana in such a manner as to protect against physical,
chemical and microbial contamination and deterioration. Sections
1004.13(n)-(p) are modified to remove the requirement that registered
organizations only transport approved medical marihuana products from a
manufacturing facility to dispensing facilities.
§ 1004.14 Laboratory testing requirements for medical marihuana. Section
1004.14(b) is amended to add the requirement that no immediate family
members of a board member, officer, manager, owner, partner, principal
stakeholder or member of a registered organization shall have an interest
or voting rights in the lab performing testing on medical marihuana. Section
1004.14(c) is amended to clarify final product testing sample
requirements. Section 1004.14(d) is modified to clarify that registered
organizations may test final products that have been packaged. Section
1004.14(e) is amended to add the requirement that sampling methodologies
must be approved by the department. Section 1004.14(g) is amended
to clarify the list of contaminants for which testing must occur and to
clarify that pesticides include herbicides and fungicides. Section
1004.14(h) is amended to clarify stability testing requirements for open
and unopened products. Section 1004.14(i) is added to include a disposal
requirement for laboratories. Section 1004.14(j) is added to include a
requirement for laboratories to return medical marihuana products deemed
unsuitable for testing to the registered organization.
§ 1004.16 Medical Marihuana marketing and advertising by registered
organizations. Section 1004.16(a) is amended to remove the requirement
that only a single black and white sign may be allowed on the external
structures of a registered organization. Section 1004.16(a) is also amended
to remove the restriction that external signs not be illuminated. Section
1004.16(m) is amended to clarify that registered organizations may educate
practitioners about medical marihuana brands or devices offered by
the registered organization.
§ 1004.20 Proper disposal of medical marihuana products by patients or
designated caregivers. Section 1004.20 is amended to allow patients and
caregivers to return approved medical marihuana products to the dispensing
facility from which they were purchased or any dispensing facility associated
with the registered organization. Section 1004.20(b) is also
amended to clarify that the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation provides guidance on proper drug disposal.
§ 1004.21 General prohibitions. Section 1004.21(d) is amended to allow
physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants, employed by
registered organizations, to counsel certified patients and designated
caregivers on medical marihuana product use, administration and risks.
§ 1004.24 Registered Organizations disposal of medical marihuana.
Section 1004.24 is added to provide guidance on acceptable processes for
disposing of medical marihuana products and by-products.
§ 55-2.15 Requirements for laboratories performing testing for medical
marihuana. Section 55-2.15(b) is amended to correct the agency name and
to include a disposal requirement for laboratories. Section 55-2.15(c) is
also amended to include a disposal requirement for laboratories.

California Cannabis Portal - Network


California Cannabis Portal

Welcome to California’s Cannabis Web Portal! It is our goal to make this site a valuable resource and a one-stop shop for all things related to the state’s effort to regulate the cannabis industry.
The site is currently in the process of being developed, so please check back regularly for new content – especially as we move toward January 1, 2018. At that time we hope to have plenty of information related to the application process for licensing and news from all three of the state’s licensing authorities, as well as information for consumers.
We hope you find everything you’re looking for. Please give us your thoughts! If there’s something you’re looking for and cannot find, we’re happy to look into adding new information and features to the site.
Site development will be an ongoing process, and we’re happy to have you with us.

The Bureau of Medical Cannabis Regulation(BMCR) is the lead agency in developing regulations for medical and adult-use cannabis in California. BMCR is responsible for licensing retailers, distributors, testing labs and microbusinesses.
The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) Office of Manufactured Cannabis Safety is responsible for regulating the manufacturers of cannabis-infused edibles for both medical and nonmedical use.
CalCannabis Cultivation Licensing, a branch office within the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA), is developing regulations to license cultivators of medical and adult-use cannabis and implementing a track-and-trace system to record the movement of cannabis through the distribution chain.

California to Withdraw Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act Proposed Rules

California to Withdraw Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act Proposed Rules

Bureau of Cannabis Control – Announcement
Earlier this spring, the Department of Consumer Affairs’ Bureau of Cannabis Control, Department of Public Health and Department of Food and Agriculture released proposed regulations for the Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act. These licensing authorities held public hearings and accepted written comments regarding the proposed regulations. However, in late June, the Legislature passed and the Governor signed into law, the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act, which creates one regulatory system for both medicinal and adult-use cannabis. As a result, the licensing authorities will withdraw the proposed medical cannabis regulations noticed for public comment on April 28 and May 5, 2017. The withdrawal is likely to happen early next month.
The three cannabis licensing authorities are each developing new proposed regulations based on the new law for the commercial medicinal and adult-use cannabis industries. During this process, the licensing authorities will consider the robust and valuable public comment received regarding the proposed medical cannabis regulations.
The licensing authorities will use the emergency rulemaking process for the new proposed regulations. The emergency regulations are expected to be published in fall 2017. The implementation date for the issuance of commercial cannabis licenses remains the same: January 2, 2018.

Springbig Cannabis Dispensary Marketing Engine

springbig
Cannabis Dispensary Marketing Engine

Founded in 2012, springbig’s software as a service (SaaS) model has positioned itself to be a leading provider in customer-loyalty and communications solutions. Now focused on the fastest growing industry in the US, springbig has been servicing its proven loyalty marketing experience and powerful suite of marketing tools directly to legal medical and recreational cannabis dispensaries. With customers across the United States, springbig is helping dispensaries keep their customers connected and engaged while allowing them to track their success and ROI in real-time.
A new source of revenue for cannabis dispensaries. Capitalize on proven technology to boost customer loyalty at cannabis retailers.

Solving Big Problems with springbig
A new source of revenue for cannabis businesses

The number of dispensaries and brands servicing the industry is growing at an annual rate of nearly 30%. Yet, they are virtually untapped for a sophisticated yet easy-to-use marketing platform that can help them connect with customers and grow their profit. spingbig offers a suite of digital services that help create additional revenue that wasn’t previously available otherwise.

Leveraging Data For Dispensaries & Brands
springbig takes data and turns it into cash

Check-In

Capture and collect customer data directly from tablets, easily review visits, engagement, and loyalty.

Loyalty

Rewarding the most loyal customers to create a high retention rate and positive consumer shopping experience.

Targeting

Easily and instantly send targeted messages based on customers interests and preferences directly.

Easy Software Integration
Integrate with any POS system or data collection program

springbig is currently partnered with LeafBuyer and Dispensarly. LeafBuyer is a leading customer acquisition tool for dispensaries and Dispensarly is a leading reviews tool for dispensaries. springbig has a robust and easy to integrate API with any partner in the space.

springbig Customer Growth

With an approximate 7,000 dispensaries nationwide, springbig currently has 92 dispensaries boasting over 95,000 individual customers who use the springbig platform on a daily basis. Based on constant market growth springbig expects these numbers to rise dramatically. Below are two case sample studies of why more and more cannabis businesses are using springbig to improve customer experience and to create a new source of untapped revenue.

Success Story #1

Over a 1 yr. period, 125,000+ SMS/month @ 0.025 cents per text ($3,125 investment) generated $37,500 annual revenue for springbig and each SMS campaign generates $1,800 in incremental revenue for the dispensary.

Success Story #2

Over a 1 yr. period, 210,000+ SMS/month @ 0.020 cents per text ($4,200 investment) generated $50,400 annual revenue for springbig and each SMS campaign generates $7,065 in incremental revenue for the dispensary.

Management and Board

Jeffrey Harris – Co-Founder/CEO
Jeffrey Harris is the founder and chairman of one of the largest loyalty marketing firms in the nation, Inte Q, providing loyalty marketing and data driven marketing solutions for big box retailers and financial services companies. Prior to founding Inte Q, Harris held various executive positions for S&H Citadel, Inc. a national incentive marketing services firm headquartered outside of Chicago. In 2011, Harris saw an opportunity to provide this same solution for small businesses and by using his expertise in the industry, created springbig. Harris just completed a 20 year run as a member of Vistage, an organization dedicated to improving the effectiveness of CEOs, since 1998. Harris is also heavily involved in charities and currently serves on the board of various local non-profit organizations in Boca Raton, Florida.
Mark Horbal – Chief Technology Officer
Mark is the Chief technology Officer of SpringBIG. He is responsible for the design and evolution of SpringBIG’s technology platform.  Mark brings over 25 years of experience in development of high availability systems.  Prior to joining SpringBIG in 2012, Mark served as the CIO of Inte Q, and founder of V Technology Group and Aeliant Corporation, both focused on mission critical applications in medical, pharma and aerospace arenas. Mark is the inventor on twelve US patents and has been widely published.  He holds undergraduate and graduate degrees in Engineering and Computer Science from University of Illinois.
Ben Kovler – CEO of GTI Clinic/Advisory Member
Ben Kovler brings his extensive experience managing complex operating companies and his deep commitment to philanthropy to the springbig team, as a board of advisors member and investor. Kovler also serves as the Chairman of GTI Investments and the CEO of GTI-Clinic Illinois, which currently operates two cultivation centers and two medical cannabis dispensaries in Illinois. Ben is the Chief Investment Officer for Kovpak II, LLC, an investment partnership company. In addition to his various investment management roles, Ben is co-founder and CEO of Invest For Kids (IFK), an annual forum that allows portfolio managers, family offices, private investors and analysts to collaborate and share investment ideas to benefit children in Illinois. In its first seven years, Invest For Kids generated more than $8,500,000 to benefit more than thirty-three youth organizations that have helped 85,000 children.
Jerry Politzer – President of National Retail Consultants/Advisory Member
Jerry is a proven senior executive with a background in generating top- and bottom-line growth in department stores, specialty stores and wholesale apparel businesses. He has served as CEO of Loehmann’s, president of Value City Furniture, and executive vice president of Filene’s Basement, and he has participated as a consultant and advisor to numerous companies. Currently, Jerry is president of National Retail Consultants, where he serves as a results-oriented leader to deliver strategic skills to the retail community. Jerry earned a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from the University of Maryland. He has affiliations with the Norton McNaughton Board of Directors and is a member of the AAMA. Past member of the United States Navy Advisory Board and the Immersion Corporation Advisory Board, he currently serves on the board at BF Technologies.

For more information about springbig
please visit www.springbig.com.

How to Measure Cannabis Extraction Efficiency

How to Measure Cannabis Extraction Efficiency

Extraction: What the Numbers Mean
Guest post by Garret Nicodemus, PhD, COO of Xabis
The extraction process in the cannabis industry is common, but often misunderstood, especially when it comes to “the numbers.”
Extraction is commonly referred to as the process by which hash oil is extracted from the cannabis plant.  There are a number of methods used for this extraction process.  At Xabis, we have focused on what is called CO2 extraction – the use of carbon dioxide as the only solvent in the extraction process.  We use this process because it produces a cleaner, purer end product, with greater efficiency and safety.
There are many “numbers” that are thrown around with respect to extraction.  We most often hear the question, “What are your yields?”  “Yield” is a term that has commonly been applied to the amount of mass extracted from the feedstock, compared to the mass of feedstock used.  For example, a 100% yield would imply that the mass of the extract product equaled the mass of the initial feedstock.  Obviously this cannot occur but a more realistic scenario is obtaining 90 grams of extract from 1 lb (454 g) of feedstock.  This would equate to a “yield” of approximately 20% (90 g divided by 454 g = 19.8%).
This percentage, or the commonly referred to “yield,” is a practically meaningless number.  Here’s why: Products made using material that has been extracted are measured and often sold based upon the amount of THC content.  The “yield” does not measure THC content in any way. Thus, the potency, the amount of THC, is the most critical number to be concerned about.
The amount of THC in the extract is directly related to the amount of THC contained within the feedstock and how effective the extraction process is in removing and collecting it.  Feedstock can have THC potencies that range from 0% to as high as 30%.  Assuming the extraction process can obtain all of the THC in the feedstock, feedstock with higher THC content will result in higher THC extracted oils compared to feedstock with lower amounts of THC content.
When the cannabis plant is subjected to extraction, the end product can contain cannabinoids, terpenes, oils, waxes, lipids, proteins, and other plant material.  The total amount of product has little to do with the actual value and efficacy of the product.  The composition, or fraction of each component of the whole, really determines the potency, effect, and value of the extract.  For example, Extract Company A processed 10 lbs of cannabis and obtained a yield of 20%.  However the end product contained 20% THC.   Extract Company B took the same feedstock and obtained a lower 10% yield but the final product contained 60% THC.  Which extractor is better?
If we look at “yield” alone, Extract Company A beat out Extract Company B.  But what if the product from Extract Company A contained more waste material thus increasing its final mass and the resulting yield?  “Yield” is important, a processor should measure how much comes out of the process compared to how much goes in.  However, a much more critical evaluation is what is called the “Extraction Efficiency.”
Extraction Efficiency is the amount of THC actually extracted, versus how much THC is available in the feedstock.  A 100% Extraction Efficiency means that 100% of the THC in the feedstock is being extracted.  In the example above, let’s assume the feedstock contained 10% THC by mass, thus 1000 grams of feedstock contains 100 grams of THC.  Extract Company A obtained a “yield” of 20% (the mass of the material coming out of the extraction equipment is approximately 20% of the mass put in to the extractor) or approximately 200 grams of material.  However, based on the potency of 20%, only 40 g of THC was extracted (20% of 20% of 1000g).
Using the same material, Extract Company B obtained a 10% “yield” – or approximately 100 grams of extract (10% of 1000g of feedstock).  However, that 100 grams of extract is comprised of 60 grams of THC (60% of 10% of 1000 g of feedstock)– 50% more THC for the same amount of feedstock than the extract of Company A.
Although Company A obtained a higher yield, the Extraction Efficiency is 40% (40g THC extracted of the total 100 grams available in the feedstock).
Company B obtained a smaller yield (10% compared to 20%), but the Extraction Efficiency is 60% (60g THC of the total 100 grams available has been extracted).
As most products are sold based on their THC content, the extract from company B is a much more profitable and efficient extraction process.  The extract from Company B contains more useable, saleable THC from the same plant material.  Thus there will be a higher number of products that can be made.
As you can see from the examples above, “yield” is important, but has very little do with the actual effectiveness or efficiency of the extraction process.  The key is Extraction Efficiency, the amount of THC actually extracted, versus how much THC is available in the feedstock.  Extraction Efficiency has a huge impact on your profitability.

About the author:
Garret Nicodemus, PhD, is the COO of Xabis and leads both engineering and scientific development of the supercritical extraction process, using his background in separations and process design and his proficiency with process simulation software (e.g. Aspen Plus, HYSYS). Garret was previously a lecturer and senior researcher for the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder, securing over one million dollars in grants and company funds, and instructing classes on extraction technologies.  Garret holds a PhD and MS in Chemical and Biological Engineering from the University of Colorado in Boulder and a BS in Chemical Engineering from Lafayette College.